|
|
Dennis Conway's Academic Publications
|
2014 |
“Which is More Vital to Production Classes: Teaching
Content or Technology?” (Expected Date of Publication in BEA’s Journal
of Media Education” is Spring 2015). This was originally presented as
part of a five-person panel at the 2014 BEA conference, and I
originated, moderated, and presented on the panel. My vote was for
“Content,” and I argued that by inspiring students with film models to
emulate, they would be more inclined to learn production cameras,
lighting and editor technology. |
2012 |
“Are Incentives From U.S. State Film Offices to Media
Productions Worth The Money?,” 9 pages, published in the BEA
(Broadcast Education Association) Journal of Media Education,
October 2012 edition. The incentives from all 50 state film
boards (and the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico) to film,
TV, and Internet productions are reviewed, and the merits of
subsidizing these artistic activities in a recession is
assessed. See:
http://en.calameo.com/books/000091789f7b01ad2cc34
* Honors: Paper was chosen for 2013 BEA Conference “Scholar to Scholar”
session by BEA PAC (Production, Aesthetics, and Criticism) Division. |
2012 |
“Why Teachers Should Assign
Mandatory Page Counts in Introductory Screenwriting Classes,” 5 pages,
published in the BEA Journal of Media Education, July 2012 edition. A
process is outlined by which screenwriting teachers can tailor their
“mandatory page count” to their particular student body, department,
school, and region of the country, in order to inspire students to
create high quality, challenging stories in various genres.
See:
http://en.calameo.com/read/0000917894307c321e6ae |
2011 |
“Are ‘Instant Film Festivals’ Good for Students?: Data
and Debate,” 7 pages, published in the BEA Journal of Media Education,
April 2011 edition. This paper is the first to measure the worldwide
“time-dependent” video production festivals, in which each production
team is given a film genre, a prop, a line, and a character, all of
which they must use in their final piece. Teams are given a limited
amount of time to write, produce, and edit their videos. I argue that
these festivals are beneficial to students. See:
http://en.calameo.com/read/0000917892f0725515422 |
2010 |
“Can Student Screenwriters Provide Valuable Criticism
To Their Peers?,” 5 pages, published in the BEA Journal of Media
Education, January 2010 edition. This is a position paper voting “No” on
the question. In a companion piece, Dr. Rustin Greene of James Madison
University argues the “Yes / Maybe” position. (I’m happy to allow
student critiques in Advanced Screenwriting, classes, though!)
See: http://en.calameo.com/read/000091789ef62bd650a1b |
2009 |
“Online Film Festivals and Diversity: Are We There
Yet?,” 26 pages, published in the BEA Journal, Feedback, Sept. 2009
edition, Volume 50, No. 5. This is a quantitative study of 22 online
film festivals. Abstract: “In 2000… It now seemed possible to create
online film festivals, in which video makers sent in digital video
entries online, to be viewed and judged by audiences online, with the
winners announced online. Well, in 2009, ‘Are we there yet?’ If so, what
advantages do online festivals have over the real world ‘bricks and
mortar’ festivals? And which communities do they best serve?”
See: http://www.beaweb.org/feedback.html |
2007 |
“The Pollffest (Poll Film Festivals) Study: Diversity
in American Film Festivals,” 12 pages, published in the BEA Journal,
Feedback, Jan. 2007 edition, Volume 48, No. 1. This three-year study was
the world’s first measure of diversity in American film festivals,
measuring their size, scope, and purpose. Hundreds of festivals were
queried through almost 2000 emails to collect the data, which correctly
predicted that most festivals would fall into categories of large scale
industry-oriented group, or small scale grassroots-oriented group, with
only a few “hybrid” festivals in the middle. See:
http://www.beaweb.org/feedback.html |
|
|
|
|